Rone v. Little

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Rone v. Little

737 S.W.2d 152, 293 Ark. 242

CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas

DecidedOctober 5, 1987

Docket87-79

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 737 S.W.2d 152 (Rone v. Little) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rone v. Little, 737 S.W.2d 152, 293 Ark. 242 (Ark. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

Darrell Hickman, Justice.

Laurie Rone sued a fellow employee, Stanley Little, and two of her employers, H.R. Hospitality, Inc., and Shamrock Properties, Inc., for personal injury. The employers had a champagne party for their employees to celebrate the opening of the Sheraton Lakeside Resort in Hot Springs, Arkansas. Rone left the party with Little, who she says was intoxicated. According to her statement, Little lost control of the vehicle, which left the road, striking a telephone pole. Rone allegedly suffered serious and permanent injuries.

Pursuant to a joint motion, the trial judge dismissed H.R. Hospitality and Shamrock Properties, leaving Little as the only defendant in the lawsuit. Rone filed an appeal from this order, but it is not an appealable order. See ARCP Rule 54(b); Kilcrease v. Butler, 291 Ark. 275, 724 S.W.2d 169 (1987).

Appeal dismissed.

Purtle, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Darrell Hickman, Justice.

Laurie Rone sued a fellow employee, Stanley Little, and two of her employers, H.R. Hospitality, Inc., and Shamrock Properties, Inc., for personal injury. The employers had a champagne party for their employees to celebrate the opening of the Sheraton Lakeside Resort in Hot Springs, Arkansas. Rone left the party with Little, who she says was intoxicated. According to her statement, Little lost control of the vehicle, which left the road, striking a telephone pole. Rone allegedly suffered serious and permanent injuries.

Pursuant to a joint motion, the trial judge dismissed H.R. Hospitality and Shamrock Properties, leaving Little as the only defendant in the lawsuit. Rone filed an appeal from this order, but it is not an appealable order. See ARCP Rule 54(b); Kilcrease v. Butler, 291 Ark. 275, 724 S.W.2d 169 (1987).

Appeal dismissed.

Purtle, J., not participating.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

737 S.W.2d 152, 293 Ark. 242, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rone-v-little-ark-1987.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack