Rondout National Bank v. Bartley Scow Co.
243 A.D. 667
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 15, 1935
StatusPublished
This text of 243 A.D. 667 (Rondout National Bank v. Bartley Scow Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Rondout National Bank v. Bartley Scow Co., 243 A.D. 667 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).
Opinion
Action by plaintiff on promissory notes. Defendant’s answer stricken out on affidavits. Summary judgment ordered. It does not appear that bank had any agreement with the defendants extending time of payment of notes. Order and judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. Present — Hill, P. J., Rhodes, McNamee, Crapser and Bliss, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
243 A.D. 667, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rondout-national-bank-v-bartley-scow-co-nyappdiv-1935.