Rondon Clavo v. Midwestern University

Opinion

1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

9 Carlos M. Rondon Clavo, No. CV-24-08025-PCT-KML

10 Plaintiff, ORDER

11 v.

12 Midwestern University, et al.,

13 Defendants. 14 15 The parties filed a joint motion for entry of protective order. (Doc. 67.) The court 16 has a standard protective order available at www.azd.uscourts.gov under: Judges’ 17 Information → Orders, Forms and Procedures → Lanham, Krissa M. If the parties agree 18 that discoverable materials should be kept confidential, they may file a stipulation 19 requesting that the court issue its standard protective order. If the parties wish to propose 20 additional provisions, they may request and stipulate to the additional proposed language, 21 subject to the court’s review. In that case, all language added to the standard order by the 22 parties should be redlined into a Word document using “tracked changes,” and the parties’ 23 Word document with the tracked changes must be emailed to chambers. The parties are 24 reminded that the mere fact the parties have designated certain materials or information as 25 confidential pursuant to an agreement or stipulation does not mean the court will 26 automatically order filings containing such information be placed under seal. See Ctr. for 27 Auto Safety v. Chrysler Grp., LLC, 809 F.3d 1092, 1101 (9th Cir. 2016). 28 / 1 Accordingly, 2 IT IS ORDERED the Motion for Protective Order (Doc. 67) is DENIED without || prejudice to renewal using the court’s standard form. 4 Dated this 7th day of August, 2025. 5 6 a , 2 f 7 WW M. LK Honorable Krissa M. Lanham 8 United States District Judge 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

_2-