Rondino v. Feld

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Rondino v. Feld

163 Misc. 708, 298 N.Y.S. 28, 1937 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1437

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedJuly 2, 1937

StatusPublished

This text of 163 Misc. 708 (Rondino v. Feld) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rondino v. Feld, 163 Misc. 708, 298 N.Y.S. 28, 1937 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1437 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).

Pincite

Opinions

Per Curiam.

In view of the written consent of the defendants-appellants to the making and entry of an order by the court granting plaintiff’s motion for a preference and setting the case down for a new trial for a day certain, said defendants waived, their right to thereafter appeal from the referee’s order.

The order denying the motion to vacate the referee’s order is not appealable.

Appeal dismissed, with ten dollars costs.

Levy and Frankenthaler, JJ., concur; Lydon, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI