Rondino v. Feld
163 Misc. 708, 298 N.Y.S. 28, 1937 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1437
Opinions
In view of the written consent of the defendants-appellants to the making and entry of an order by the court granting plaintiff’s motion for a preference and setting the case down for a new trial for a day certain, said defendants waived, their right to thereafter appeal from the referee’s order.
The order denying the motion to vacate the referee’s order is not appealable.
Appeal dismissed, with ten dollars costs.
Levy and Frankenthaler, JJ., concur; Lydon, J., dissents.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Rondino v. Feld, 163 Misc. 708, 298 N.Y.S. 28, 1937 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1437 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).
163 Misc. 708 (Rondino v. Feld) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Herpe v. . Herpe
122 N.E. 204 (New York Court of Appeals, 1919)
Alsens American Portland Cement Works v. Degnon Contracting Co.
118 N.E. 210 (New York Court of Appeals, 1917)
Clark v. Kirby
153 N.E. 79 (New York Court of Appeals, 1926)
Citizens National Bank v. Caldwell
233 A.D. 875 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1931)