Rondinelli v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railroad

5 A.D.2d 842, 170 N.Y.S.2d 947, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6998
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 10, 1958
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 5 A.D.2d 842 (Rondinelli v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rondinelli v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railroad, 5 A.D.2d 842, 170 N.Y.S.2d 947, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6998 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1958).

Opinion

In an action by a passenger on a motor bus against the owner of the bus and its operator, the owner and operator appeal from a judgment in favor of the passenger entered after trial by the court without a jury. The passenger was alleged to have been injured when she was caused to fall to the ground while alighting from the bus. Judgment affirmed, with costs. The presence of a parked ear in the bus stop did not relieve appellants of their duty to provide respondent with a safe place to alight (Frazier v. Westchester St. Transp. Co., 272 App. Div. 819, affd. 297 N. Y. 620). The record amply justifies the finding that the appellants did not fully discharge this duty. There was no negligence on the part of the respondent in alighting at the place selected by the appellants (Truesdell v. Erie R. R. Co., 114 App. Div. 34; Schwartz v. Brooklyn & Queens Tr. Corp., 264 App. Div. 905). Beldoek, Murphy and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur; Wenzel, Acting P. J., and Ughetta, J, dissent and vote to reverse the judgment and to dismiss the complaint, with the following memorandum: There is no proof of actionable negligence. Respondent, who unfortunately was lame, had to wear a brace on one leg and had to use a cane. While alighting from the bus and before her left foot had reached the pavement, she fell forward and was injured. The decision of the trial court indicates that the bus driver should have left his seat to assist the respondent in alighting from the bus. We think that in a metropolitan area this an unrequired duty and certainly beyond the reasonable care required.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Scott v. Middle East Airlines Co., SA
240 F. Supp. 1 (S.D. New York, 1965)
Irving Cohen, D/B/A Pralcoa v. Kalwall Corporation
255 F.2d 285 (Second Circuit, 1958)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
5 A.D.2d 842, 170 N.Y.S.2d 947, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6998, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rondinelli-v-chicago-rock-island-pacific-railroad-nyappdiv-1958.