Ronan v. Briggs

220 N.E.2d 909, 351 Mass. 700
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided November 2, 1966·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

The plaintiff appeals from an order of the Superior Court sustaining generally the defendant’s demurrer to his declaration which alleged that the defendant alienated the affections of his wife and “also the children bom naturally of their marriage.” Although not stated in the declaration, the action is presumably one in tort. The declaration did not allege loss of consortium by the husband and was thereby rendered vulnerable to a demurrer. Neville v. Gile, 174 Mass. 305, 306. Sherry v. Moore, 258 Mass. 420, 423. In addition, no cause of action exists for the alienation of the affections of children. Nelson v. Richwagen, 326 Mass. 485, 486-488.

Order sustaining demurrer affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ronan v. Briggs, 220 N.E.2d 909, 351 Mass. 700 (Mass. 1966).

220 N.E.2d 909 (Ronan v. Briggs) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Quinn v. Walsh
732 N.E.2d 330 (Massachusetts Appeals Court, 2000)
Murphy v. LS.K.Con. of New England, Inc.
571 N.E.2d 340 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1991)
MacKintosh v. Carter
451 N.W.2d 285 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1990)
Bartanus v. Lis
480 A.2d 1178 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1984)
Ferriter v. Daniel O'Connell's Sons, Inc.
413 N.E.2d 690 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1980)
Strode v. Gleason
510 P.2d 250 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 1973)