Ronaldo S. Ligons v. David Crist

Eighth Circuit

Ronaldo S. Ligons v. David Crist

82 F. App'x 504

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

DecidedDecember 10, 2003

Docket03-2701

StatusUnpublished

This text of 82 F. App'x 504 (Ronaldo S. Ligons v. David Crist) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ronaldo S. Ligons v. David Crist, 82 F. App'x 504 (8th Cir. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

*505 [UNPUBLISHED]

PER CURIAM.

Minnesota inmate Ronaldo Ligons appeals the district court’s 1 28 U.S.C. § 1915A dismissal of his civil case alleging denial of access to legal materials. We conclude the complaint was properly dismissed because, prior to dismissal, Ligons did not allege an actual injury with respect to any particular legal claim.

Accordingly, we affirm, see 8th Cir. R. 47B, but we modify the dismissal to be without prejudice. See Sabers v. Delano, 100 F.3d 82, 84 (8th Cir.1996) (per curiam).

1

. The Honorable David S. Doty, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Jonathan G. Lebedoff, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI