Ronald X. Gordon v. the Honorable Sonny James
This text of Ronald X. Gordon v. the Honorable Sonny James (Ronald X. Gordon v. the Honorable Sonny James) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion issued December 5, 2002
In The
Court of Appeals
For The
First District of Texas
NO. 01-00-00232-CV
RONALD X. GORDON, Appellant
V.
THE HONORABLE SONNY JAMES, Appellee
On Appeal from the 212th District Court
Galveston County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 98-CV-0196
O P I N I O N
On October 3, 2002, the Court issued an order stating that the appeal would be dismissed in 30 days unless (1) appellant paid the $125 appellate filing fee and (2) appellant paid for and filed a supplemental clerk's record demonstrating that the appeal was taken from a final judgment and that this Court had jurisdiction of the appeal.
The filing fee has not been paid, and no supplemental clerk's record has been filed. Appellant has not responded to the Court's order of October 3, 2002. Accordingly, for the reasons set forth in the Court's order of October 3, 2002, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. All pending motions are denied as moot.
It is so ORDERED.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Taft, Alcala, and Price.
Do not publish. Tex. R. App. P. 47.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Ronald X. Gordon v. the Honorable Sonny James, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ronald-x-gordon-v-the-honorable-sonny-james-texapp-2002.