Ronald Winegardner v. Catholic Charities of the Texas Panhandle
Opinion
In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo
No. 07-20-00087-CV
RONALD WINEGARDNER, APPELLANT
V.
CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE TEXAS PANHANDLE, APPELLEE
On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1 Potter County, Texas Trial Court No. 109,395-1-CV, Honorable Walton Weaver, Presiding
February 9, 2021 ORDER Before QUINN, C.J., and PARKER and DOSS, JJ.
On February 3, 2021, Appellant Ronald Winegardner filed with the Court a
document entitled “Appellants’ (1) Objection to Court of Appeals’ Opinion and Judgment
of 10/26/2021 [sic], (2) Objection to Mandate of 1/13/2021 and (3) Objection to Clerk’s
Threatened Dismissal of Appeal” (hereinafter “the Objections”), whereby he requests a
copy of a trial court record and a hearing before the Court. Our opinion and judgment in this appeal issued October 26, 2020. A motion for
rehearing was not filed. Hence, our plenary power to vacate or modify our judgment
expired sixty days after October 26, 2020. See TEX. R. APP. P. 19.1(a) (expiration of
plenary power when no motion for rehearing filed); 19.3 (court of appeals cannot vacate
or modify its judgment after expiration of plenary power except for exceptions not here
applicable). Our mandate issued January 13, 2021. We did not vacate or modify our
judgment; therefore, our mandate may not be recalled. See TEX. R. APP. P. 18.7, 19.3(b).
Based on the foregoing, all requests for relief sought by Winegardner in the Objections
are dismissed for want of subject matter jurisdiction.
It is so ordered.
Per Curiam
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ronald Winegardner v. Catholic Charities of the Texas Panhandle (Ronald Winegardner v. Catholic Charities of the Texas Panhandle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.