Ronald Willard v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 8, 2018·No. 17-4390·Published

Opinion

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA

No. 1D17-4390

RONALD WILLARD, Petitioner, v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

Petition for Writ of Mandamus – Original Jurisdiction.

February 9, 2018

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of mandamus is denied on the merits.

See Thomas v. State, Dept. of Revenue, 74 So. 3d 145 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011) (stating that absent a showing that an express and distinct demand for performance was made, mandamus will not lie to compel a court to rule on a pleading in a civil matter).

WETHERELL, MAKAR, and KELSEY, JJ., concur.

Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331.

Ronald Willard, pro se, Petitioner. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ronald Willard v. State of Florida, (Fla. Ct. App. 2018).

Ronald Willard v. State of Florida (Ronald Willard v. State of Florida) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Thomas v. State, Department of Revenue
74 So. 3d 145 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)