Ronald Willard v. State of Florida
This text of Ronald Willard v. State of Florida (Ronald Willard v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________
No. 1D17-4390 _____________________________
RONALD WILLARD,
Petitioner,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Respondent. _____________________________
Petition for Writ of Mandamus – Original Jurisdiction.
February 9, 2018
PER CURIAM.
The petition for writ of mandamus is denied on the merits. See Thomas v. State, Dept. of Revenue, 74 So. 3d 145 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011) (stating that absent a showing that an express and distinct demand for performance was made, mandamus will not lie to compel a court to rule on a pleading in a civil matter).
WETHERELL, MAKAR, and KELSEY, JJ., concur. _____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________
Ronald Willard, pro se, Petitioner.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Ronald Willard v. State of Florida, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ronald-willard-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2018.