Ronald Whitlow v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedOctober 13, 2016
Docket04-16-00629-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Ronald Whitlow v. State (Ronald Whitlow v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ronald Whitlow v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas October 13, 2016

No. 04-16-00629-CR

Ronald WHITLOW, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 399th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2015CR10248 Honorable Ray Olivarri, Judge Presiding

ORDER The trial court revoked the defendant’s community supervision on August 11, 2016; Appellant did not file a motion for new trial or any other motion challenging the trial court’s judgment within thirty days. See TEX. R. APP. P. 21.2 (motion for new trial); Ex parte Matthews, 452 S.W.3d 8, 11 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2014, no pet.). Thus, Appellant’s notice of appeal was due to be filed by September 12, 2016. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2(a); Strange v. State, 258 S.W.3d 184, 186 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2007, pet. ref’d). A motion for extension of time to file a notice of appeal and a notice of appeal were due to be filed not later than September 26, 2016. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.3. On September 26, 2016, Appellant filed a Motion for Leave to File Late Notice of Appeal. However, Appellant did not file a notice of appeal on or before September 26, 2016, and he has not filed one to date. To invoke this court’s appellate jurisdiction, an appellant must file both a motion for extension of time to file a late notice of appeal and a notice of appeal within the time period allowed by Rule 26.3. See Strange, 258 S.W.3d at 186 (“To have invoked our rule 26.3 authority, appellant had to (1) file notices of appeal for both trial-court causes in the trial court and (2) file motions requesting an extension of time with this Court within the 15 days after the notices of appeal were due.”). Although the clerk’s record has not yet been filed, our records indicate that Appellant’s notice of appeal was not timely filed and this court lacks jurisdiction in this appeal. See Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 523 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996); see also Ater v. Eighth Court of Appeals, 802 S.W.2d 241, 243 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991) (stating that an out-of-time appeal from a final felony conviction may be sought by filing a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure). Therefore, we ORDER Appellant to show cause in writing within TEN DAYS of the date of this order why this appeal should not be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. See Olivo, 918 S.W.2d at 522; Ater, 802 S.W.2d at 243. All other appellate deadlines are SUSPENDED pending further order of this court.

_________________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 13th day of October, 2016.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ater v. Eighth Court of Appeals
802 S.W.2d 241 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1991)
Strange v. State
258 S.W.3d 184 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2008)
Olivo v. State
918 S.W.2d 519 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1996)
Ex Parte Devan S. Matthews
452 S.W.3d 8 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Ronald Whitlow v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ronald-whitlow-v-state-texapp-2016.