Ronald W. Benninghoff v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Fifth Circuit

Ronald W. Benninghoff v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

614 F.2d 398, 45 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 1646, 1980 U.S. App. LEXIS 19367

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedMarch 21, 1980

Docket78-3783

StatusPublished

Cited by21 cases

This text of 614 F.2d 398 (Ronald W. Benninghoff v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ronald W. Benninghoff v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 614 F.2d 398, 45 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 1646, 1980 U.S. App. LEXIS 19367 (5th Cir. 1980).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Appellant Ronald W. Benninghoff appeals from the November 1978 written opinion and order of the United States Tax Court that affirmed the decision of the Commissioner of Internal Revenue to assess a deficiency of $245 against appellant in his federal income tax for the taxable year 1973. 71 T.C. 216 (1978). Since the parties stipulated to the facts, the only issue on appeal is whether the Tax Court correctly held that appellant, a policeman employed by the Canal Zone Government, could not exclude from his gross income for the year 1973 the value of lodging and utilities fur *399 nished to him by his employer under Section 119 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954.

We affirm on the basis of the majority and concurring opinions that realistically construed the statutory language of Section 119(2) that the lodging be furnished “on the business premises” to mean that the provision of lodging by an employer must constitute an integral part of the business activities of the employer. Appellant Benninghoff failed to show a direct, substantial relationship between the provision of lodging and the law enforcement interests of his employer. The mere ownership by the Canal Zone Government of the home itself and the land on which the home was situated is not sufficient, nor even essential, to prove that the lodging is “on the business premises” of the employer for purposes of Section 119(2). The facts in this case show that the lodging was furnished by his employer, the Canal Zone Government, to appellant Benninghoff primarily for his. personal use and not to further significantly its own law enforcement interests. Thus, the Tax Court correctly held that appellant Benninghoff could not exclude the value of the lodging and utilities furnished to him by his employer for the taxable year 1973.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Appellant Ronald W. Benninghoff appeals from the November 1978 written opinion and order of the United States Tax Court that affirmed the decision of the Commissioner of Internal Revenue to assess a deficiency of $245 against appellant in his federal income tax for the taxable year 1973. 71 T.C. 216 (1978). Since the parties stipulated to the facts, the only issue on appeal is whether the Tax Court correctly held that appellant, a policeman employed by the Canal Zone Government, could not exclude from his gross income for the year 1973 the value of lodging and utilities fur *399 nished to him by his employer under Section 119 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954.

We affirm on the basis of the majority and concurring opinions that realistically construed the statutory language of Section 119(2) that the lodging be furnished “on the business premises” to mean that the provision of lodging by an employer must constitute an integral part of the business activities of the employer. Appellant Benninghoff failed to show a direct, substantial relationship between the provision of lodging and the law enforcement interests of his employer. The mere ownership by the Canal Zone Government of the home itself and the land on which the home was situated is not sufficient, nor even essential, to prove that the lodging is “on the business premises” of the employer for purposes of Section 119(2). The facts in this case show that the lodging was furnished by his employer, the Canal Zone Government, to appellant Benninghoff primarily for his. personal use and not to further significantly its own law enforcement interests. Thus, the Tax Court correctly held that appellant Benninghoff could not exclude the value of the lodging and utilities furnished to him by his employer for the taxable year 1973.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

614 F.2d 398, 45 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 1646, 1980 U.S. App. LEXIS 19367, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ronald-w-benninghoff-v-commissioner-of-internal-revenue-ca5-1980.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack