Ronald Taylor v. Matthew Cate, Secretary Cdcr
787 F.3d 1241, 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 9426, 2015 WL 3540679
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedJune 5, 2015
Docket11-55247
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 787 F.3d 1241 (Ronald Taylor v. Matthew Cate, Secretary Cdcr) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Ronald Taylor v. Matthew Cate, Secretary Cdcr, 787 F.3d 1241, 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 9426, 2015 WL 3540679 (9th Cir. 2015).
Opinion
ORDER
Upon the vote of a majority of nonre-cused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Ronald Taylor v. Matthew Cate, Secretary Cdcr
811 F.3d 326 (Ninth Circuit, 2016)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
787 F.3d 1241, 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 9426, 2015 WL 3540679, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ronald-taylor-v-matthew-cate-secretary-cdcr-ca9-2015.