Ronald Stephen Satterfield v. Gary Long and Richard M. Smith
This text of Ronald Stephen Satterfield v. Gary Long and Richard M. Smith (Ronald Stephen Satterfield v. Gary Long and Richard M. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Tennessee primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS AT KNOXVILLE
FILED March 16, 2000 RONALD STEPHEN SATTERFIELD, ) Cecil Crowson, Jr. SR., ) Appellate Court Clerk ) Plaintiff-Appellee, ) ) ) vs. ) KNOX CIRCUIT ) E1999-00349-COA-R3-CV ) ) GARY LONG and RICHARD M. ) SMITH, ) ) Defendants-Appellants. )
OPINION ON SECOND PETITION TO REHEAR
In light of an opinion of the Supreme Court, which was
filed subsequent to our opinion denying the first petition to
rehear in this case (Brown v. Wal-Mart, No. M1997-00138-SC-
R11-CV), the Court granted Plaintiff Ronald Stephen Satterfield,
Sr., leave to file a second petition to rehear. Upon considering the petition, along with the response
and the Supreme Court case above noted, we conclude the second
petition to rehear is meritorious and amend our original opinion
to provide that the entire judgment for compensatory damages of
$80,000.00 shall be adjudged against the Defendant Gary Long.
Costs incident to the petition to rehear are adjudged
against Mr. Long.
____________________________ Houston M. Goddard, P.J.
CONCUR:
____________________________ Charles D. Susano, Jr., J.
____________________________ William H. Inman, Sr.J.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Ronald Stephen Satterfield v. Gary Long and Richard M. Smith, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ronald-stephen-satterfield-v-gary-long-and-richard-tennctapp-2000.