Ronald Saunders v. Eric Sohr, Doctor Prison Health Services, Incorporated Earl Beshears, Warden

Fourth Circuit

Ronald Saunders v. Eric Sohr, Doctor Prison Health Services, Incorporated Earl Beshears, Warden

48 F.3d 1217, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 11054, 1995 WL 105295

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedMarch 14, 1995

Docket94-7173

StatusPublished

This text of 48 F.3d 1217 (Ronald Saunders v. Eric Sohr, Doctor Prison Health Services, Incorporated Earl Beshears, Warden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ronald Saunders v. Eric Sohr, Doctor Prison Health Services, Incorporated Earl Beshears, Warden, 48 F.3d 1217, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 11054, 1995 WL 105295 (4th Cir. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

48 F.3d 1217
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Ronald SAUNDERS, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
Eric SOHR, Doctor; Prison Health Services, Incorporated;
Earl Beshears, Warden, Defendants--Appellees.

No. 94-7173.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 16, 1995.
Decided March 14, 1995.

Before HAMILTON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Saunders v. Sohr, No. CA-94-1021-MJG (D. Md. Sept. 12, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

48 F.3d 1217
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Ronald SAUNDERS, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
Eric SOHR, Doctor; Prison Health Services, Incorporated;
Earl Beshears, Warden, Defendants--Appellees.

No. 94-7173.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 16, 1995.
Decided March 14, 1995.

Before HAMILTON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Saunders v. Sohr, No. CA-94-1021-MJG (D. Md. Sept. 12, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

48 F.3d 1217, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 11054, 1995 WL 105295, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ronald-saunders-v-eric-sohr-doctor-prison-health-s-ca4-1995.