Ronald Rudolph Rodriguez v. the State of Texas

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-21-00609-CR

Ronald Rudolph Rodriguez, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE 207TH DISTRICT COURT OF COMAL COUNTY NO. CR2015-395, THE HONORABLE R. BRUCE BOYER, JUDGE PRESIDING

ORDER FOR CLERK TO PROVIDE A P P E L L A T E R E C O R D TO A P P E L L A N T

PER CURIAM

Appellant’s court-appointed counsel has filed a motion to withdraw supported

by a brief concluding that the instant appeal is frivolous and without merit. See Anders

v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967). Appellant’s counsel has certified to the Court that he

provided copies of the motion and brief to appellant, advised appellant of his right to examine

the appellate record and file a pro se response, and supplied appellant with a form motion for

pro se access to the appellate record. See Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313, 319-20 (Tex. Crim.

App. 2014). Appellant has timely filed the motion requesting access to the appellate record with

this Court.

Appellant’s pro se motion is granted. We hereby direct the clerk of the trial court

to provide a copy of the reporter’s record and clerk’s record to appellant, and to provide written verification to this Court of the date and manner in which the appellate record was provided, on

or before September 23, 2022. See id. at 321.

It is ordered on September 13, 2022.

Before Justices Goodwin, Baker, and Kelly

Do Not Publish