Ronald Rompilla v. Martin Horn, Commissioner, Pennsylvania Department of Corrections Martin Horn, Appellant/cross-Appellee

359 F.3d 310, 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 3664
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided February 25, 2004·No. 00-9005, 00-9006·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinions

SUR PETITION FOR REHEARING

ALITO, Circuit Judge.

The petition for rehearing filed by ap-pellee/eross appellant in the above entitled case having been submitted to the judges who participated in the decision of this court and to all the other available circuit judges of the circuit in regular active service, and no judge who concurred in the decision having asked for rehearing, and a majority of the circuit judges of the circuit in regular active service not having voted for rehearing by the court en banc, the petition for rehearing is denied. Judges Sloviter and McKee would have granted rehearing en banc for the reasons set forth in the dissent. Judges Nygaard, Ambro and Smith would have granted rehearing en banc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ronald Rompilla v. Martin Horn, Commissioner, Pennsylvania Department of Corrections Martin Horn, Appellant/cross-Appellee, 359 F.3d 310, 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 3664 (3d Cir. 2004).

359 F.3d 310 (Ronald Rompilla v. Martin Horn, Commissioner, Pennsylvania Department of Corrections Martin Horn, Appellant/cross-Appellee) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Whitehead v. State
955 So. 2d 448 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 2006)
Rompilla v. Beard
545 U.S. 374 (Supreme Court, 2005)
Stevens v. Horn
319 F. Supp. 2d 592 (W.D. Pennsylvania, 2004)
Marshall v. Hendricks
313 F. Supp. 2d 423 (D. New Jersey, 2004)