Ronald Norris v. State
This text of Ronald Norris v. State (Ronald Norris v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
RONALD NORRIS,
Appellant,
v. Case No. 5D16-2875
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee.
________________________________/
Opinion filed December 2, 2016
3.800 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Putnam County, Clyde E. Wolfe, Judge.
Ronald Norris, Bristol, pro se.
No Appearance for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Ronald Norris appeals the summary denial of his Florida Rule of Criminal
Procedure 3.800(a) motion in which he alleged that his written sentence conflicted with
the trial court’s oral pronouncement. The record before us does not contain the transcript
of the sentencing hearing, nor was it attached to Norris’s motion or the trial court’s order.
Accordingly, we remand the case to the trial court to determine if the transcript is in the
record. If it is, the trial court shall either grant the relief Norris seeks or attach portions of
the sentencing transcript that refute his claim. If the transcript is not in the record, Norris’s motion shall be denied without prejudice to allow him to file an amended motion with the
transcript attached. Beard v. State, 27 So. 3d 186, 188 (Fla. 5th DCA 2010).
REVERSED AND REMANDED.
LAWSON, C.J., and TORPY and EVANDER, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Ronald Norris v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ronald-norris-v-state-fladistctapp-2016.