Ronald Moran Cadillac, Inc. v. United States

392 F.3d 1006, 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 26125, 2004 WL 2903899
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Ronald Moran Cadillac, Inc. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 385 F.3d 1230
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided December 16, 2004·No. 02-57052·Published

Opinion

ORDER

The Opinion filed October 12, 2004, slip op. 14491, is amended as follows:

1. At slip op. 14502, in the last sentence before sub-section C, change “RMC concedes that it has yet to pay any of the pre-1994 interest to either Caesar or TMC.” to “The parties agree in their joint statement of uncontroverted facts that RMC had accrued, but had not deducted, the unpaid interest on the notes for the periods prior to the sale of the note to TMC and did not pay these amounts prior to December 31, 1994.”

With this amendment, the panel has voted to deny the petition for rehearing. The petition for rehearing is DENIED.

No future petitions for panel or en banc rehearing will be entertained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ronald Moran Cadillac, Inc. v. United States, 392 F.3d 1006, 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 26125, 2004 WL 2903899 (9th Cir. 2004).

392 F.3d 1006 (Ronald Moran Cadillac, Inc. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gausvik v. Perez
392 F.3d 1006 (Ninth Circuit, 2004)