Ronald McDougler v. State
This text of Ronald McDougler v. State (Ronald McDougler v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
April 04, 2014 ATLANTA,__________________
The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:
A14D0298. RONALD MCDOUGLER v. THE STATE.
Ronald McDougler was convicted of two counts of sale of cocaine and two
counts of possession of cocaine in 2009. McDougler’s convictions were affirmed on
appeal, but this Court vacated the trial court’s denial of the defendant’s speedy trial
claim and remanded the case for the entry of a proper order on that issue. See
McDougler v. State, 232 Ga. App. 828 (748 SE2d 475) (2013). After the remittutur,
the trial court entered its order denying McDougler’s speedy trial claim on November
21, 2013. On March 24, 2014, McDougler filed a “Motion for Discretionary (Out of
Time) Appeal. We lack jurisdiction.
An application for discretionary appeal must be filed within 30 days of the entry
of the order or judgment to be appealed. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (d). A party’s failure
to meet this statutory deadline deprives us of jurisdiction to consider the application.
Wilson v. Carver, 252 Ga. App. 174 (555 SE2d 848) (2001). While this Court is
authorized to grant an extension of time for the filing of an application for
discretionary appeal, requests for extensions must be filed “on or before the due date
of the discretionary application.” Court of Appeals Rule 31 (g). Otherwise, this Court
lacks the authority to grant the request. See Gable v. State, 290 Ga. 81, 85 (2) (a) (720
SE2d 170) (2011); OCGA § 5-6-39 (d). Because McDougler did not file a request for an extension within 30 days of
entry of the order denying his motion to dismiss based upon the violation of his
constitutional right to a speedy trial, no out-of-time application is permitted.
Accordingly, this application is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia 04/04/2014 Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,__________________ I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.
, Clerk.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Ronald McDougler v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ronald-mcdougler-v-state-gactapp-2014.