Ronald Mays v. McCalla Reymer Leifert Pierce; et al.
Opinion
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION
RONALD MAYS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. v. ) 2:26cv43-MHT ) (WO) McCALLA REYMER LEIFERT ) PIERCE; et al., ) ) Defendants. )
ORDER Upon consideration of plaintiff’s motion for a temporary restraining order (Doc. 1), it is ORDERED that the motion is denied. Plaintiff has failed to meet the requirements for issuance of a temporary restraining order. See Parker v. State Bd. of Pardons & Paroles, 275 F.3d 1032, 1034- 35 (11th Cir. 2001) (listing requirements); Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(b)(1). DONE, this the 21st day of January, 2026. /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ronald Mays v. McCalla Reymer Leifert Pierce; et al. (Ronald Mays v. McCalla Reymer Leifert Pierce; et al.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.