Ronald M. Coleman v. United States

Ninth Circuit

Ronald M. Coleman v. United States

378 F.2d 56, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 6523

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided May 4, 1967·No. 21242·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was convicted by a jury of violation of 18 U.S.C. § 659 — the stealing and taking of goods from interstate commerce with the intent to convert them to his own use. The issues of asportation, intent and sufficiency of the evidence were for the jury. The value of the goods and the fact of interstate commerce were stipulated to.

The jury adopted the prosecution’s view of the evidence, and convicted appellant. We affirm.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was convicted by a jury of violation of 18 U.S.C. § 659 — the stealing and taking of goods from interstate commerce with the intent to convert them to his own use. The issues of asportation, intent and sufficiency of the evidence were for the jury. The value of the goods and the fact of interstate commerce were stipulated to.

The jury adopted the prosecution’s view of the evidence, and convicted appellant. We affirm.

Ronald M. Coleman v. United States, 378 F.2d 56, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 6523 (9th Cir. 1967).

Pincite

378 F.2d 56 (Ronald M. Coleman v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related