Ronald M. Coleman v. United States

Ninth Circuit

Ronald M. Coleman v. United States

378 F.2d 56, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 6523

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedMay 4, 1967

Docket21242

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 378 F.2d 56 (Ronald M. Coleman v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ronald M. Coleman v. United States, 378 F.2d 56, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 6523 (9th Cir. 1967).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was convicted by a jury of violation of 18 U.S.C. § 659 — the stealing and taking of goods from interstate commerce with the intent to convert them to his own use. The issues of asportation, intent and sufficiency of the evidence were for the jury. The value of the goods and the fact of interstate commerce were stipulated to.

The jury adopted the prosecution’s view of the evidence, and convicted appellant. We affirm.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was convicted by a jury of violation of 18 U.S.C. § 659 — the stealing and taking of goods from interstate commerce with the intent to convert them to his own use. The issues of asportation, intent and sufficiency of the evidence were for the jury. The value of the goods and the fact of interstate commerce were stipulated to.

The jury adopted the prosecution’s view of the evidence, and convicted appellant. We affirm.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

378 F.2d 56, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 6523, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ronald-m-coleman-v-united-states-ca9-1967.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack