Ronald Lucero v. State

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION

Cause number: 01-12-01010-CR Style: Ronald Lucero v The State of Texas Date motion filed*: March 14, 2013 Type of motion: Motion to stay the issuance of the mandate Party filing motion: Appellant Document to be filed:

Is appeal accelerated? No

If motion to extend time: Original due date: Number of previous extensions: Current Due date: Date Requested:

Ordered that motion is:

 Granted If document is to be filed, document due:  Absent extraordinary circumstances, the Court will not grant additional motions to extend time  Denied  Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)  Other: _____________________________________ According to Lucero’s motion, he has not yet filed a petition for discretionary review; any order on the motion would therefore be premature. Further, because this is not an accelerated appeal, our mandate will not issue until after the Court of Criminal Appeals resolves any timely-filed petition for discretionary review. See TEX. R. APP. P. 18.1, 18.6.

Judge's signature:/s/ Harvey Brown 

Panel consists of ____________________________________________

Date: March 21, 2013 November 7, 2008 Revision