Ronald Lewis Boyer v. Sgt. Herbert Riley Sgt. John Moriaroty and Sal Chrum, of the St. Louis Police Dept., Homicide Division

675 F.2d 185, 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 20348
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedApril 7, 1982
Docket81-1760
StatusPublished

This text of 675 F.2d 185 (Ronald Lewis Boyer v. Sgt. Herbert Riley Sgt. John Moriaroty and Sal Chrum, of the St. Louis Police Dept., Homicide Division) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ronald Lewis Boyer v. Sgt. Herbert Riley Sgt. John Moriaroty and Sal Chrum, of the St. Louis Police Dept., Homicide Division, 675 F.2d 185, 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 20348 (8th Cir. 1982).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Ronald Lewis Boyer was convicted in Missouri state court of murder. An appeal from that conviction is pending.

Subsequent to his conviction, Boyer filed an action for actual and punitive damages against three St. Louis police officers pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. He alleged that the officers had deprived him of his constitutional rights by refusing to permit him to have a lawyer present during an interrogation at which he incriminated himself. He also alleged that the officers erased parts of the taped interview.

The district court dismissed the action without prejudice under the doctrine of Younger v. Harris, 401 U.S. 37, 91 S.Ct. 746, 27 L.Ed.2d 669 (1971). It stated that “it is not appropriate for the federal courts to consider Boyer’s claims until his state conviction is final” because the constitutional issues raised in the 1983 action were also being considered in the criminal appeal.

Boyer appeals. We reverse and remand to the district court with directions to it to reinstate Boyer’s action, but to hold that action in abeyance until the state proceedings are completed. We do so for the reasons stated in William Seltzer v. John Ashcroft, et al., - F.2d ——, decided this date. The district court, of course, retains the right to dismiss the action for proper reasons that are unrelated to the validity of Boyer’s constitutional claim.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Younger v. Harris
401 U.S. 37 (Supreme Court, 1971)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
675 F.2d 185, 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 20348, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ronald-lewis-boyer-v-sgt-herbert-riley-sgt-john-moriaroty-and-sal-chrum-ca8-1982.