Ronald L. Sutphin v. Olivia J. Garland, H.G. Ozinol, M.D., Kurt Fox, M.D., Linda Deola, R.N., and Wayne Rankin, P.A.

828 F.2d 18, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 10935, 1987 WL 44608

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: August 18, 1987
• Docket: 87-6042
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

828 F.2d 18
published Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Ronald L. SUTPHIN, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
Olivia J. GARLAND, H.G. Ozinol, M.D., Kurt Fox, M.D., Linda
Deola, R.N., and Wayne Rankin, P.A., Defendant--Appellee.

No. 87-6042

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted May 8, 1987.
Decided August 18, 1987.

Ronald L. Sutphin, appellant pro se.

Guy Winston Horsley, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, for appellee Garland.

Elizabeth Morrell Allen, Mary Moffett Hutcheson Priddy, McGuire, Woods, Battle & Boothe, for appellees Ozinol, Fox, Deola and Rankin.

Before K.K. HALL and JAMES DICKSON PHILLIPS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

A review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate discloses that this appeal from its order refusing relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 is without merit. Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we dispense with oral argument and affirm the judgment below on the reasoning of the district court. Sutphin v. Garland, C/A No. 85-14-H (E.D. Va., Mar. 3, 1987).

AFFIRMED.