Ronald K. Henderson v. Edward W. Murray Mary Sue Terry
This text of 12 F.3d 204 (Ronald K. Henderson v. Edward W. Murray Mary Sue Terry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Ronald K. HENDERSON, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
EDWARD W. MURRAY; Mary Sue Terry, Respondents-Appellees.
No. 93-6709.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Dec. 7, 1993.
Ronald K. Henderson, appellant Pro Se.
Katherine P. Baldwin, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, for appellees.
W.D. Va.
DISMISSED.
Before PHILLIPS and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
OPINION
Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 (1988) petition. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Henderson v. Murray, No. CA-92-709-R (W.D. Va. June 18, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
12 F.3d 204, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 36721, 1993 WL 503074, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ronald-k-henderson-v-edward-w-murray-mary-sue-terry-ca4-1993.