Ronald K. Henderson v. Edward W. Murray Mary Sue Terry
Opinion
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Ronald K. HENDERSON, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
EDWARD W. MURRAY; Mary Sue Terry, Respondents-Appellees.
No. 93-6709.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Dec. 7, 1993.
Ronald K. Henderson, appellant Pro Se.
Katherine P. Baldwin, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, for appellees.
W.D. Va.
DISMISSED.
Before PHILLIPS and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
OPINION
Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 (1988) petition. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Henderson v. Murray, No. CA-92-709-R (W.D. Va. June 18, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
12 F.3d 204 (Ronald K. Henderson v. Edward W. Murray Mary Sue Terry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.