Ronald Jerome Lee v. Marydell Guevara, Etc.

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 15, 2014
Docket14-1879
StatusPublished

This text of Ronald Jerome Lee v. Marydell Guevara, Etc. (Ronald Jerome Lee v. Marydell Guevara, Etc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ronald Jerome Lee v. Marydell Guevara, Etc., (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

Opinion

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Opinion filed August 15, 2014. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D14-1879 Lower Tribunal No. 14-005658 ________________

Ronald Jerome Lee, Petitioner,

vs.

Marydell Guevara, Director of Miami-Dade County Department of Corrections, Respondent.

A Case of Original Jurisdiction - Habeas Corpus

Herbert Erving Walker III, Esq., for petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Marlon J. Weiss, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

Before SUAREZ, SALTER and EMAS, JJ.

ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

SUAREZ, J. Ronald Lee filed his petition for writ of Habeas Corpus after the trial court

granted the State’s Motion to Revoke Defendant’s Bond. Mr. Lee requests this

Court to instruct the lower court to either release him or to reduce his bond. The

State has filed a limited concession noting that the trial court failed to comply with

Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.131 by failing to issue the required findings

of fact and conclusions of law in support of the court’s order revoking bond. See

State v Blair, 39 So. 3d 1190 (Fla. 2010); Rigby v. State, 29 So. 3d 390 (Fla. 5th

DCA 2010); Dupree v. Cochran, 698 So. 2d 945 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997).

We grant the petition only insofar as to remand the case to the trial court for

the purpose of holding an immediate evidentiary hearing on the State’s motion to

revoke bond and to make the required findings of fact and conclusions of law. §

704.041(4)(c), Florida Statutes (2013); Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.132(c)(2). Mr. Lee shall

not be released pending the outcome of the evidentiary hearing, or of any appeals

by right. This opinion shall become effective immediately, notwithstanding the

filing of any motion for rehearing.

Petition granted and remanded with instructions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dupree v. Cochran
698 So. 2d 945 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)
Rigby v. State
29 So. 3d 390 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)
State v. Blair
39 So. 3d 1190 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Ronald Jerome Lee v. Marydell Guevara, Etc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ronald-jerome-lee-v-marydell-guevara-etc-fladistctapp-2014.