Ronald Jean-Louis v. 345 Riverside Drive Apartment Corp.
This text of 259 A.D.2d 402 (Ronald Jean-Louis v. 345 Riverside Drive Apartment Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Diane Lebedeff, J.), entered on or about December 3, 1997, which granted plaintiffs’ motion to restore the action to the trial calendar, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The action, which was marked off the calendar after an unanswered calendar call, was properly restored to the calendar upon plaintiffs’ attorney’s affirmation that he never received notice from the court of the missed calendar call, and court records consistent with the possibility that such notice was misdirected to plaintiffs’ former attorney. Significantly, plaintiffs were busily engaged in significant pretrial activity with third-party defendant during the period that the case was off the calendar. The merit of the action is sufficiently demonstrated by the verified complaint, of which the motion court was free to take judicial notice. Nor is there any indication of prejudice to defendant attributable to the off-calendar status of the action. Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Nardelli, Williams and Wallach, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
259 A.D.2d 402, 687 N.Y.S.2d 104, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2805, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ronald-jean-louis-v-345-riverside-drive-apartment-corp-nyappdiv-1999.