Ronald J. Arrias v. The Immigration and Naturalization Service
This text of 386 F.2d 191 (Ronald J. Arrias v. The Immigration and Naturalization Service) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The Immigration and Naturalization Service is hereby substituted as party respondent in place of the State of California and the United States of America (see Immigration and Nationality Act § 106(a) (3), 8 U.S.C. § 1105a(a) (3)). The petition must be dismissed because the petitioner has failed to exhaust his administrative remedies as required by section 106(c). Rodriguez-De Leon v. I.N.S., 9 Cir., 1963, 324 F.2d 311; Murillo-Aguilera v. I.N.S., 9 Cir., 1963, 313 F.2d 141; Mai Kai Fong v. I.N.S., 9 Cir., 1962, 305 F.2d 239; Siaba-Fernandez v. Rosenberg, 9 Cir., 1962, 302 F.2d 139.
Dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
386 F.2d 191, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 4408, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ronald-j-arrias-v-the-immigration-and-naturalization-service-ca9-1967.