Ronald J. Arrias v. The Immigration and Naturalization Service

386 F.2d 191, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 4408
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided November 28, 1967·No. 21054·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

*192 PER CURIAM:

The Immigration and Naturalization Service is hereby substituted as party respondent in place of the State of California and the United States of America (see Immigration and Nationality Act § 106(a) (3), 8 U.S.C. § 1105a(a) (3)). The petition must be dismissed because the petitioner has failed to exhaust his administrative remedies as required by section 106(c). Rodriguez-De Leon v. I.N.S., 9 Cir., 1963, 324 F.2d 311; Murillo-Aguilera v. I.N.S., 9 Cir., 1963, 313 F.2d 141; Mai Kai Fong v. I.N.S., 9 Cir., 1962, 305 F.2d 239; Siaba-Fernandez v. Rosenberg, 9 Cir., 1962, 302 F.2d 139.

Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ronald J. Arrias v. The Immigration and Naturalization Service, 386 F.2d 191, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 4408 (9th Cir. 1967).

386 F.2d 191 (Ronald J. Arrias v. The Immigration and Naturalization Service) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Yan Wo Cheng v. Rinaldi
389 F. Supp. 583 (D. New Jersey, 1975)