Ronald Gunn v. Carolyn W. Colvin
Opinion
MEMORANDUM *
Ronald G. Gunn appeals the district court’s judgment affirming the Commissioner of Social Security’s decision denying his application for Supplemental Security Income under Title XVI of the Social Security Act. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291.
Because Gunn did not argue any discernable issues in his opening brief, we affirm the district court. See Nevada Dept. of Corrections v. Greene, 648 F.3d 1014, 1020 (9th Cir.2011) (pro se appellant’s issues were deemed waived by his failure to support any of the issues with argument); Independent Towers of Wash. v. Washington, 350 F.3d 925, 929 (9th Cir. 2003) (this court reviews only issues argued specifically in a party’s opening brief).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
581 F. App'x 691 (Ronald Gunn v. Carolyn W. Colvin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.