Ronald Gunn v. Carolyn W. Colvin

581 F. App'x 691
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided July 1, 2014·No. 13-35052·Unpublished·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

MEMORANDUM *

Ronald G. Gunn appeals the district court’s judgment affirming the Commissioner of Social Security’s decision denying his application for Supplemental Security Income under Title XVI of the Social Security Act. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291.

Because Gunn did not argue any discernable issues in his opening brief, we affirm the district court. See Nevada Dept. of Corrections v. Greene, 648 F.3d 1014, 1020 (9th Cir.2011) (pro se appellant’s issues were deemed waived by his failure to support any of the issues with argument); Independent Towers of Wash. v. Washington, 350 F.3d 925, 929 (9th Cir. 2003) (this court reviews only issues argued specifically in a party’s opening brief).

AFFIRMED.

*

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ronald Gunn v. Carolyn W. Colvin, 581 F. App'x 691 (9th Cir. 2014).

581 F. App'x 691 (Ronald Gunn v. Carolyn W. Colvin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related