Ronald Graham v. Sylvia Whitten, Irene Dunn Hayes, Dietician Tabelina, Dietician Harris, Dietician Chuck Thompson George Hinkle Erving, Counselor

21 F.3d 422, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 15898, 1994 WL 118337
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedApril 6, 1994
Docket94-6093
StatusPublished

This text of 21 F.3d 422 (Ronald Graham v. Sylvia Whitten, Irene Dunn Hayes, Dietician Tabelina, Dietician Harris, Dietician Chuck Thompson George Hinkle Erving, Counselor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ronald Graham v. Sylvia Whitten, Irene Dunn Hayes, Dietician Tabelina, Dietician Harris, Dietician Chuck Thompson George Hinkle Erving, Counselor, 21 F.3d 422, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 15898, 1994 WL 118337 (4th Cir. 1994).

Opinion

21 F.3d 422
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Ronald GRAHAM, Plaintiff Appellant,
v.
Sylvia WHITTEN, Irene Dunn; Hayes, Dietician; Tabelina,
Dietician; Harris, Dietician; Chuck Thompson;
George Hinkle; Erving, Counselor,
Defendants Appellees.

No. 94-6093.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted March 17, 1994.
Decided April 6, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert R. Merhige, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-93-426)

Ronald Graham, appellant pro se.

E.D.Va.

DISMISSED.

Before PHILLIPS and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. The district court assessed a filing fee in accordance with Evans v. Croom, 650 F.2d 521 (4th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1153 (1982), and dismissed the case without prejudice when Appellant failed to comply with the fee order. Finding no abuse of discretion, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Evans v. Croom
650 F.2d 521 (Fourth Circuit, 1981)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
21 F.3d 422, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 15898, 1994 WL 118337, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ronald-graham-v-sylvia-whitten-irene-dunn-hayes-di-ca4-1994.