Ronald F. Avery (Cross-Appellee) v. Dylan Baddour and Hearst Communications, Inc. (Cross-Appellants)

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedApril 21, 2016
Docket04-16-00184-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Ronald F. Avery (Cross-Appellee) v. Dylan Baddour and Hearst Communications, Inc. (Cross-Appellants) (Ronald F. Avery (Cross-Appellee) v. Dylan Baddour and Hearst Communications, Inc. (Cross-Appellants)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ronald F. Avery (Cross-Appellee) v. Dylan Baddour and Hearst Communications, Inc. (Cross-Appellants), (Tex. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas April 21, 2016

No. 04-16-00184-CV

Ronald F. AVERY, Appellant/Cross-Appellee

v.

Dylan BADDOUR and Hearst Communications, Inc., Appellees/Cross-Appellants

From the 2nd 25th Judicial District Court, Guadalupe County, Texas Trial Court No. 15-2186-CV Honorable W.C. Kirkendall, Judge Presiding

ORDER Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice Karen Angelini, Justice Marialyn Barnard, Justice

On April 15, 2016, appellees/cross-appellants, Dylan Baddour and Hearst Communications, Inc. (collectively, “Hearst”), filed an agreed motion that Hearst be allowed to consolidate their cross-issues with their appellees’ brief. The motion is GRANTED, and the following deadlines and word limits are hereby ORDERED:

Ronald Avery’s opening appellant’s brief is due May 2, 2016, and is subject to a 15,000- word limit. See TEX. R. APP. P. 9.4(i)(1), (2)(B); TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(a).

Hearst’s combined opening appellees/cross-appellants’ brief is due twenty days from the filing of Avery’s brief, and is subject to a combined word limit of 30,000. See TEX. R. APP. P. 9.4(i)(1), (2)(B)-(C); TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(a).

Avery’s combined appellant/cross-appellee’s reply brief is due twenty days after Hearst’s combined appellees/cross-appellants’ brief, and is subject to a 22,500-word limit. See TEX. R. APP. P. 9.4(i)(1), (2)(B)-(C); TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(b).

Hearst’s cross-appellants’ reply brief is due twenty days after Avery’s combined appellant/cross-appellee’s brief, and is subject to a 7,500-word limit. See TEX. R. APP. P. 9.4(i)(1), (2)(C); TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(b). _________________________________ Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 21st day of April, 2016.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Ronald F. Avery (Cross-Appellee) v. Dylan Baddour and Hearst Communications, Inc. (Cross-Appellants), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ronald-f-avery-cross-appellee-v-dylan-baddour-and-hearst-texapp-2016.