Ronald E. Bell v. United States Parole Commission, J.J. Clark, Warden, Responents-Appellees

883 F.2d 68
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedAugust 23, 1989
Docket89-7560
StatusUnpublished

This text of 883 F.2d 68 (Ronald E. Bell v. United States Parole Commission, J.J. Clark, Warden, Responents-Appellees) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ronald E. Bell v. United States Parole Commission, J.J. Clark, Warden, Responents-Appellees, 883 F.2d 68 (4th Cir. 1989).

Opinion

883 F.2d 68
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Ronald E. BELL, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION, J.J. Clark, Warden,
Responents-Appellees.

No. 89-7560.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted June 2, 1989.
Decided Aug. 9, 1989.
Rehearing and Rehearing In Banc Denied Aug. 23, 1989.

Ronald E. Bell, appellant pro se.

Debra Jean Prillaman Office of the United States Attorney, for appellees.

Before WIDENER, CHAPMAN, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Ronald E. Bell appeals from the district court's order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2241. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Bell v. United States Parole Commission, C/A No. 88-124-R (E.D.Va. Feb. 17, 1989). We deny Bell's motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
883 F.2d 68, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ronald-e-bell-v-united-states-parole-commission-jj-clark-warden-ca4-1989.