Ronald Dwayne Whitfield v. Clear Lake Nissan and Santander Consumer USA
Opinion
CLAuse Mum tens',
?rotoefc^ora\5\>LL»a4ne YiniVPle\A I In The U3L23S* e
o B*e5Var YWhi/CWar \_-aKe l ^filnc+ • feBft/F.rsV SerMite CfeM UPlion, ' Courts o£ I^QeMml 'Houston Nissan, ^jndjr ^rri^un+iTB^ J g^sumgr^^j^ gJj^^M: I \W THE I FirA 3nA Four4^h CW °l nl^-MX&WT-rX • gf /fA//) NOTICES TO THE ^KWeLlate Coups' Jusmces,Tf\\«L courts I° Aim&ES/ ft\STMLT CLBRVS/ A^\-e./ Ar\xr\&. ajnA r\am&/ \V ro^hi PveServV/YxKe. W Yvas ^\re.-a^M ^JSfserAeA WxsAtcAroriaY Pvok\ett\S "Por Or HQt 4r>eT\v COurV iTSe)f V^as JurlsdibKon an ^he mervts/ +d reMar "a. Ji^c^on &ui<\3 -file a (\o^e a? aPP^ai aAfr +he -Vn-aA -iud^t- Ci\ or berVh 4na T*efeflAaM*"9 Md+TOos 4-o Q^fttei WVvVr^vOn. \ re<22d\ asftv\3 b^u -to \ \p ma tvo-rice Or aWeaA-tiia& riled ^^Aauier^ Tntftosei £>TAer and <3BM£ Sam-e. -te Moul +a -Pite/ +ten -H^e a?feaA rnus+- he. dtertfeS-eA ^s ^Pre\^^aAyre.lV because I-V Wftel^ \s/ \ ui\\ haae aVso caused ^10u +d -Kle hurfiiaer tff fYta+ronS -fer re>Y^&r»A3« 1ujfluicl a^K/ in an3. eueM-y ^^u wvtf lemeM- a *%li^ *aV ^nce TEAuirinS even eAec+romc •FAta^s \nA~ca-Ve 4fce T\kah ana Wftme ^ Maor ^ei>u4?es So necew»/l.3 a*a -fitfflS ££DE£^, h ku-v ?nfc»k\ii Mujor¥>\r\3 4ar a jAj&v-ice. _ catted me on tiefeaSS, BSYftrtS 3W+ uAwaAfcer Soul a^d^eA vne an aA^m^. ecV. and fDsed erf Wti tYM>\to\ Vd 9m£eed loAVwu.4- '•twc/ Y\nfiL)in3 ^ -Hie. a*feaiS ££orA- \a^ JurfcxL'.cKo* AV/er ^Our Order 9rariftA2> K\oKom Afc Compel arb'^r^Jon/ \ belike ^SU ^e fee «nM UiiW be oVsYairxecl w\ -Vv>e- Vv\SD/ Au^Se tsaVver/ P\ease be or> m'»\W\ - ciD\W^ XaiuLi £-\Tm5 C +loo ar more -\rt> SuVepm^e EKciv cmveiO in ^he. Case of Wbi^ieid V. ftarvta, Vtand-u.^ / -ftsr \ Ad rio-v uj^fw ^lou. -hi a^iwp i nd in \i3h-F ff# irvaM-Autt 4 JuASe &aKen 1 J>ul£+ cal\ed C -h*ia& i5 Sunday ^ Nuaus+2-OGJ/ttie PlsV Cburt Cpf ftWes\£>- AnA \e£+ a. message on 4ha Prwaie W\e o£ 4he cai\er -to Con-ra^r-Me ^&m» Ulhen 4he Un To Till Ae&nsetK&Ad -H\e K4+omrf( +br -He Courrri! kWronxea'S tf#cc , 4he ^ e reived on -frovn LS+ CdA dea}Tn£) utth ^ 40 3ue m e^-Vher He -VnaJ Caurr5 or Tn He attetate cour-V-s, k^ J3eu iue c\*a^;n3 \ Ytete. cowim^-r^erl Per^UT^j /-Hven Slid m^ K^n\£i* she accdfis* *a^?ik^;fe cz^-n. X£ ^6vjl 'are uttaaptfa a^ 4b ^mV1 Or \ec\nXc^\\\es> ,n nt4 Oom^lifiY^ar lj4v\ +h^ Su(Ve™e Cour+ #4 T0xa& uri+ten ^yt/J ado94ed aWeftsiiL roVe^ ze>/ a our raned^ Vs oo+ -v-t> XSuse cut tWI Court clem -Vo £'ile an WPiiaMW erf Cbntes-K ach / toa-F -Vo £it& 3 ^QweST/ l*AAV Lrd C&A\ a *YioVlor\}* W>\Sitl3 Vhe ttta\ juASe. -te n SV^e" mh Ho-WEfi Vo vYoceeci On Mf€a\ X&flti- bauia£> ±b S& "Teo^^ Vn
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ronald Dwayne Whitfield v. Clear Lake Nissan and Santander Consumer USA (Ronald Dwayne Whitfield v. Clear Lake Nissan and Santander Consumer USA) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.