Ronald Douglas Nevels v. State
This text of Ronald Douglas Nevels v. State (Ronald Douglas Nevels v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NUMBERS 13-17-00250-CR AND 13-17-00215-CR
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
RONALD DOUGLAS NEVELS, Appellant,
v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.
On Appeal from the 319th District Court of Nueces County, Texas.
ORDER OF ABATEMENT Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Contreras and Benavides Order Per Curiam
Appellant’s briefs were originally due on August 24, 2017. This Court has
previously granted appellant two extensions of time to file the briefs, with the briefs being
due on December 4, 2017. On December 6, 2017, the Clerk of the Court notified
appellant’s counsel that the briefs had not been filed and requested a response concerning the failure to file the briefs within ten days. Counsel has nevertheless failed
to file either a response or appellate briefs in these matters.
Accordingly, we now ABATE this appeal and REMAND these causes to the trial
court for further proceedings pursuant to Rule 38.8(b)(2) and (3) of the Texas Rules of
Appellate Procedure. Upon remand, the trial court shall utilize whatever means
necessary to make appropriate findings and recommendations concerning the following:
(1) whether appellant desires to prosecute this appeal; (2) why appellant's counsel has
failed to file a brief and whether counsel has effectively abandoned the appeals; (3)
whether appellant has been denied effective assistance of counsel; (4) whether
appellant's counsel should be removed; and (5) whether appellant is indigent and entitled
to court-appointed counsel.
If the trial court determines that appellant does want to continue the appeals, that
present counsel should be removed, and that appellant is indigent and entitled to
court-appointed counsel, the trial court shall appoint new counsel to represent appellant
in these appeals. If new counsel is appointed, the name, address, email address,
telephone number, and state bar number of said counsel shall be included in an order
appointing counsel.
The trial court shall cause its findings and recommendations, together with any
orders it may enter regarding the aforementioned issues, to be included in a supplemental
clerk's record. Furthermore, the trial court shall cause a supplemental reporter's record
of any proceedings to be prepared. The supplemental clerk's record and supplemental
2 reporter's record, if any, shall be filed with the Clerk of this Court on or before the
expiration of thirty days from the date of this order.
It is so ORDERED.
PER CURIAM
Do not publish Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)
Delivered and filed the 12th day of January, 2018.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Ronald Douglas Nevels v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ronald-douglas-nevels-v-state-texapp-2018.