Ronald Dockery v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 23, 2002
Docket10-01-00234-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Ronald Dockery v. State (Ronald Dockery v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ronald Dockery v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

Ronald Dockery v. State


IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS


No. 10-01-234-CR


     RONALD DOCKERY,

                                                                         Appellant

     v.


     THE STATE OF TEXAS,

                                                                         Appellee


From the 54th District Court

McLennan County, Texas

Trial Court # 98-266-C

MEMORANDUM OPINION

      Ronald Dockery pled guilty to two counts of sexual assault of a child. There was no plea bargain. The trial court sentenced him to 15 years in prison on each count. Dockery appeals the trial court’s denial of bail on appeal.

      The Code of Criminal Procedure provides:

(b) The defendant may not be released on bail pending the appeal from any felony conviction where the punishment equals or exceeds 10 years confinement or where the defendant has been convicted of an offense listed under Section 3g(a)(1), Article 42.12, but shall immediately be placed in custody and the bail discharged.


Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 44.04(b) (Vernon Pamp. 2002). An offense listed under article 42.12, section 3g(a)(1) includes the offense of sexual assault. Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 42.12 § 3g(a)(1)(H) (Vernon Supp. 2002). The law in effect at the time of the application for bail governs applications for bail. See Act of May 19, 1999, 76th Leg., R.S., ch. 546, § 2, 1999 Tex. Gen. Laws at 3042; Ex parte Cole, 43 S.W.3d 713, 716 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2001, pet. ref’d); Cortez v. State, 36 S.W.3d 216, 219 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2001, pet. ref’d).

      The current version of article 44.04(b) became effective on September 1, 1999. Act of May 19, 1999, 76th Leg., R.S., ch. 546, § 3, 1999 Tex. Gen. Laws at 3042. In April of 2000, Dockery made his initial application for bail on appeal. He made a second application in July of 2001. The trial court denied both requests.

      Because Dockery made his bail requests after the effective date of the current article 44.04(b), bail on appeal for Dockery is governed by the current article 44.04(b) and is precluded. Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 44.04(b) (Vernon Pamp. 2002). Thus, the trial court did not err in denying bail on appeal for Dockery. The denial of bail on appeal is affirmed.

                                                                         PER CURIAM


Before Chief Justice Davis,

      Justice Vance, and

      Justice Gray

Affirmed

Opinion delivered and filed January 23, 2002

Do not publish

[CR25]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cortez v. State
36 S.W.3d 216 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2001)
Ex parte Cole
43 S.W.3d 713 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Ronald Dockery v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ronald-dockery-v-state-texapp-2002.