Ronald Deshon Runels v. State
This text of Ronald Deshon Runels v. State (Ronald Deshon Runels v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
JUDGMENT RENDERED DECEMBER 6, 2018
NO. 03-18-00036-CR
Ronald Deshon Runels, Appellant
v.
The State of Texas, Appellee
APPEAL FROM THE 450TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, GOODWIN, AND BOULAND MODIFIED AND, AS MODIFIED, AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE PURYEAR
This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction rendered by the trial court. Having reviewed
the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no error in the court’s
judgment requiring reversal. However, there was error in the judgment that requires correction.
Therefore, the Court modifies the trial court’s judgment to reflect that appellant entered a plea of
“not true” to the second enhancement allegation listed in the judgment and that the jury found the
allegation to be “true.” The judgment, as modified, is affirmed. Because appellant is indigent
and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Ronald Deshon Runels v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ronald-deshon-runels-v-state-texapp-2018.