Ronald Deshon Runels v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided December 6, 2018·No. 03-18-00036-CR·Published

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED DECEMBER 6, 2018

NO. 03-18-00036-CR

Ronald Deshon Runels, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 450TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, GOODWIN, AND BOULAND MODIFIED AND, AS MODIFIED, AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE PURYEAR

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction rendered by the trial court. Having reviewed

the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no error in the court’s

judgment requiring reversal. However, there was error in the judgment that requires correction.

Therefore, the Court modifies the trial court’s judgment to reflect that appellant entered a plea of

“not true” to the second enhancement allegation listed in the judgment and that the jury found the

allegation to be “true.” The judgment, as modified, is affirmed. Because appellant is indigent

and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ronald Deshon Runels v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2018).

Ronald Deshon Runels v. State (Ronald Deshon Runels v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.