Ronald Dean Kelly, Jr. v. State of Iowa
This text of 919 N.W.2d 637 (Ronald Dean Kelly, Jr. v. State of Iowa) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Iowa primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
On May 12, 2015, the district court imposed sentence on Ronald Kelly's conviction of second-degree robbery. Kelly was sentenced to an indeterminate term of incarceration not to exceed ten years, with a mandatory minimum of seven years. In September 2016, Kelly filed an application for postconviction relief (PCR), arguing equal protection requires his sentence to be reconsidered in light of the legislature's recent amendment of Iowa Code section 902.12 (2016). 1 The State moved for summary dismissal, contending the amendment to section 902.12 could only be applied prospectively. Kelly resisted summary dismissal, arguing the different treatment resulting from the legislative amendment violates equal protection and the amendment should be applied retroactively. The district court granted the State's motion for summary dismissal, concluding the new statute does not apply retroactively. The court did not address Kelly's equal-protection claim.
Kelly appeals. He contends the district court erred in finding no genuine issue of material fact pertaining to his claim the sentence imposed upon his underlying conviction was unconstitutional as in violation of his right to equal protection. He specifically argues that all individuals serving a sentence for the crime of second-degree robbery are similarly situated, but individuals who are convicted of the crime before July 1, 2016 are treated differently for parole and work-release purposes than individuals who are convicted on or after July 1, 2016, and such different treatment violates equal protection.
We note from the outset our agreement with the State that Kelly failed to preserve error on the claim he raises on appeal, as the district court never ruled upon Kelly's equal-protection claim and Kelly thereafter failed to request a ruling on the issue.
See
Meier v. Senecaut
,
In any event, a panel of this court recently considered and rejected an argument identical to Kelly's, that "a person convicted of second-degree robbery prior to July 1, 2016, is similarly situated to any person convicted of second-degree robbery on or after July 1, 2016," and equal protection requires such individuals "to be treated alike under the amendment to section 902.12."
See generally
Clayton v. Dist. Ct.
,
AFFIRMED.
Compare
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
919 N.W.2d 637, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ronald-dean-kelly-jr-v-state-of-iowa-iowactapp-2018.