Ronald David Piazza v. the State of Texas
This text of Ronald David Piazza v. the State of Texas (Ronald David Piazza v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The
Court of Appeals
Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
__________________
NO. 09-22-00029-CR __________________
RONALD DAVID PIAZZA, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
__________________________________________________________________
On Appeal from the 163rd District Court Orange County, Texas Trial Cause No. B190257-R __________________________________________________________________
ORDER
On January 20, 2022, the trial court convicted Ronald David Piazza and
imposed a ten-year prison sentence for possession of a controlled substance. The
trial court signed a certification that this is not a plea bargain case, and the defendant
has a right of appeal. Information provided by the District Clerk indicates Rife
Kimler represented Piazza as retained counsel in the trial court. The Notice of
Appeal—Criminal form received from the Orange County District Clerk states it
was a plea bargain with a guilty plea. On January 27, 2022, Piazza filed a pro se
1 notice of appeal. The trial court clerk and the court reporter notified the Court that
the appellant has not paid for the record. On March 22, 2022, we received
correspondence from Rife Kimler, Piazza’s trial counsel, wherein Mr. Kimler
informed the Court that Piazza has not retained him for the appeal and informed the
Court that Piazza filed in the trial court a statement of indigence with his notice of
appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 20.2.
The Court finds that a hearing is necessary to protect the appellant’s right of
appeal. It is therefore, ordered that the appeal is abated and the case is remanded to
the trial court for a hearing at which the appellant shall be present. We direct the trial
court to determine whether the appellant has the right of appeal, if so, whether he
desires to appeal, and if so, whether the appellant is indigent, whether he has retained
counsel for the appeal, and if so, whether counsel has abandoned the appeal or has a
conflict of interest that prevents him from representing Piazza on appeal. If the trial
court determines that the appellant desires to appeal, that he is indigent, and that he
has neither retained counsel for the appeal nor obtained a court-ordered attorney, we
direct the trial court to appoint counsel to represent Piazza on appeal. If the trial court
appoints appellate counsel, we direct the trial court to order the trial court clerk and
the court reporter to prepare a free record due to the appellant’s indigence. A
supplemental reporter’s record of the hearing here ordered, together with a
supplemental clerk’s record containing any orders signed by the trial court in
2 connection with the hearing, shall be filed with the Court of Appeals by April 29,
2022. All appellate timetables are suspended while the case is before the trial court.
ORDER ENTERED March 30, 2022.
PER CURIAM
Before Golemon, C.J., Kreger and Johnson, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Ronald David Piazza v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ronald-david-piazza-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2022.