Ronald D. Briggs v. The Door Store Phil Burkhalter Pete Calvi Robbie Sandifer, the Door Store Owner
This text of 872 F.2d 1024 (Ronald D. Briggs v. The Door Store Phil Burkhalter Pete Calvi Robbie Sandifer, the Door Store Owner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
872 F.2d 1024
Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
Ronald D. BRIGGS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
The DOOR STORE; Phil Burkhalter; Pete Calvi; Robbie
Sandifer, The Door Store Owner, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 88-6056.
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
April 5, 1989.
Before MERRITT and BOGGS, Circuit Judges, and CONTIE, Senior Circuit Judge.
ORDER
This appeal has been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 9(a), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.
A review of the record indicates that appellant appealed from an order denying a motion to compel discovery. Such an order is not appealable. See Butcher v. Bailey, 753 F.2d 465, 471 (6th Cir.), cert. dismissed, 473 U.S. 925 (1985); Cochran v. Birkel, 651 F.2d 1219, 1221 (6th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1152 (1982); City of Cleveland v. Krupansky, 619 F.2d 572, 574-75 (6th Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 834 (1980).
It is ORDERED that the appeal be and hereby is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Rule 9(b)(1), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
872 F.2d 1024, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 4475, 1989 WL 33142, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ronald-d-briggs-v-the-door-store-phil-burkhalter-p-ca6-1989.