Ronald Crenshaw v. City of Corpus Christi

Court of Appeals of Texas

Ronald Crenshaw v. City of Corpus Christi

DecidedNovember 4, 2004

Docket13-04-00115-CV

StatusPublished

This text of Ronald Crenshaw v. City of Corpus Christi (Ronald Crenshaw v. City of Corpus Christi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ronald Crenshaw v. City of Corpus Christi, (Tex. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

NUMBER 13-04-115-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

___________________________________________________________________

RONALD CRENSHAW, Appellant,

v.

CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, ET AL., Appellees.

___________________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 28th District Court

of Nueces County, Texas

___________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Hinojosa, Yañez,and Garza

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, RONALD CRENSHAW, attempted to perfect an appeal from a judgment entered by the 28th District Court of Nueces County, Texas, in cause number 02-3367-A. Judgment in this cause was signed on October 31, 2003. An untimely motion for new trial was filed on December 10, 2003. Pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 26.1, appellant’s notice of appeal was due on December 1, 2003, but was not filed until January 16, 2004.

Notice of this defect was given so that steps could be taken to correct the defect, if it could be done. Appellant was advised that, if the defect was not corrected within ten days from the date of receipt of this Court’s letter, the appeal would be dismissed. Appellant filed responses to this Court’s notice on March 11, 2004 and March 22, 2004; however, said responses fail to correct the defect.

The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file, appellant’s failure to timely perfect his appeal, and appellant’s responses to this Court’s notice, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. The appeal is hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION.

PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed this

the 4th day of November, 2004.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

NUMBER 13-04-115-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

___________________________________________________________________

RONALD CRENSHAW, Appellant,

v.

CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, ET AL., Appellees.

___________________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 28th District Court

of Nueces County, Texas

___________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Hinojosa, Yañez,and Garza

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, RONALD CRENSHAW, attempted to perfect an appeal from a judgment entered by the 28th District Court of Nueces County, Texas, in cause number 02-3367-A. Judgment in this cause was signed on October 31, 2003. An untimely motion for new trial was filed on December 10, 2003. Pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 26.1, appellant’s notice of appeal was due on December 1, 2003, but was not filed until January 16, 2004.

Notice of this defect was given so that steps could be taken to correct the defect, if it could be done. Appellant was advised that, if the defect was not corrected within ten days from the date of receipt of this Court’s letter, the appeal would be dismissed. Appellant filed responses to this Court’s notice on March 11, 2004 and March 22, 2004; however, said responses fail to correct the defect.

The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file, appellant’s failure to timely perfect his appeal, and appellant’s responses to this Court’s notice, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. The appeal is hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION.

PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed this

the 4th day of November, 2004.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Ronald Crenshaw v. City of Corpus Christi, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ronald-crenshaw-v-city-of-corpus-christi-texapp-2004.