Ronald Cortes v. Local Board Number 7, Rogelio Lopez v. Local Board Number 146

Fifth Circuit

Ronald Cortes v. Local Board Number 7, Rogelio Lopez v. Local Board Number 146

468 F.2d 626

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedNovember 8, 1972

Docket28356

StatusPublished

This text of 468 F.2d 626 (Ronald Cortes v. Local Board Number 7, Rogelio Lopez v. Local Board Number 146) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ronald Cortes v. Local Board Number 7, Rogelio Lopez v. Local Board Number 146, 468 F.2d 626 (5th Cir. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

468 F.2d 626

Ronald CORTES, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
LOCAL BOARD NUMBER 7 et al., Defendants-Appellees.
Rogelio LOPEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
LOCAL BOARD NUMBER 146 et al., Defendants-Appellees.

Nos. 28295, 28356.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.

Nov. 8, 1972.

Mario Obledo, Pete Tijerina, San Antonio, Tex., for plaintiffs-appellants.

William S. Sessions, U. S. Atty., San Antonio, Tex., Robert V. Zener, Reed Jonston, Jr., Attys., Civil Div., Appellate Section, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., Crawford C. Martin, Atty. Gen. of Tex., Jack Sparks, Asst. Atty. Gen., Austin, Tex., Donald L. Horowitz, Atty., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., for defendants-appellees.

Before JOHN R. BROWN, Chief Judge, and WISDOM, GEWIN, BELL, THORNBERRY, COLEMAN, GOLDBERG, AINSWORTH, GODBOLD, DYER, SIMPSON, MORGAN, CLARK, INGRAHAM and RONEY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

It having been made known to the court that Ronald Cortes, appellant in No. 28295, is past the age of 26 and is not eligible for induction under current Selective Service policies, and that Rogelio Lopez, appellant in No. 28356, has been reclassified as IV-F, the appeal in each of these causes is dismissed as moot.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

468 F.2d 626

Ronald CORTES, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
LOCAL BOARD NUMBER 7 et al., Defendants-Appellees.
Rogelio LOPEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
LOCAL BOARD NUMBER 146 et al., Defendants-Appellees.

Nos. 28295, 28356.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.

Nov. 8, 1972.

Mario Obledo, Pete Tijerina, San Antonio, Tex., for plaintiffs-appellants.

William S. Sessions, U. S. Atty., San Antonio, Tex., Robert V. Zener, Reed Jonston, Jr., Attys., Civil Div., Appellate Section, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., Crawford C. Martin, Atty. Gen. of Tex., Jack Sparks, Asst. Atty. Gen., Austin, Tex., Donald L. Horowitz, Atty., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., for defendants-appellees.

Before JOHN R. BROWN, Chief Judge, and WISDOM, GEWIN, BELL, THORNBERRY, COLEMAN, GOLDBERG, AINSWORTH, GODBOLD, DYER, SIMPSON, MORGAN, CLARK, INGRAHAM and RONEY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

It having been made known to the court that Ronald Cortes, appellant in No. 28295, is past the age of 26 and is not eligible for induction under current Selective Service policies, and that Rogelio Lopez, appellant in No. 28356, has been reclassified as IV-F, the appeal in each of these causes is dismissed as moot.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

468 F.2d 626, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ronald-cortes-v-local-board-number-7-rogelio-lopez-v-local-board-number-ca5-1972.