Ronald Campbell v. Faizan International, Inc., Asif Razzak and Haris Rashid

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedAugust 29, 2023
Docket01-23-00396-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Ronald Campbell v. Faizan International, Inc., Asif Razzak and Haris Rashid (Ronald Campbell v. Faizan International, Inc., Asif Razzak and Haris Rashid) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ronald Campbell v. Faizan International, Inc., Asif Razzak and Haris Rashid, (Tex. Ct. App. 2023).

Opinion

Opinion issued August 29, 2023

In The

Court of Appeals For The

First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-23-00396-CV ——————————— RONALD CAMPBELL, Appellant V. FAIZAN INTERNATIONAL, INC., ASIF RAZZAK, AND HARIS RASHID, Appellees

On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 4 Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 1130859

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Ronald Campbell, appeals from a judgment signed on May 17,

2023. Appellant has not paid for the clerk’s record or the required filing fee and

has not established indigence for purposes of appellate costs. See TEX. R. APP. P.

5, 20.1 (indigence), 37.3(b) (allowing dismissal of appeal if no clerk’s record filed due to appellant’s fault); see also TEX. GOV’T CODE §§ 51.207, 51.208, 51.941(a),

101.041; Order Regarding Fees Charged in the Supreme Court, in Civil Cases in

the Courts of Appeals, and Before the Judicial Panel on Multi-District Litigation,

Misc. Docket No. 15-9158 (Tex. Aug. 28, 2015). Appellant failed to respond to

our notices of June 22, 2023 (past due filing fee) and July 25, 2023 (non-payment

for clerk’s record) which advised appellant that should he not provide proof of

payment for the filing fee and for preparation of the clerk’s record or establish

indigence, this appeal was subject to dismissal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5 (allowing

enforcement of rule), 37.3(b) (allowing dismissal of appeal if no clerk’s record

filed due to appellant’s fault), 42.3(c) (allowing involuntary dismissal of case).

We dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. We dismiss any pending

motions as moot.

PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Kelly, Landau, and Farris.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Ronald Campbell v. Faizan International, Inc., Asif Razzak and Haris Rashid, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ronald-campbell-v-faizan-international-inc-asif-razzak-and-haris-rashid-texapp-2023.