Ronald Babino v. the State of Texas
This text of Ronald Babino v. the State of Texas (Ronald Babino v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The
Court of Appeals
Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
__________________
NO. 09-24-00153-CR __________________
RONALD BABINO, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
__________________________________________________________________
On Appeal from the 252nd District Court Jefferson County, Texas Trial Cause No. F22-39753 __________________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Ronald Babino filed a notice of appeal in a case that had been dismissed. The
Clerk of the Court issued a notice to the parties that our jurisdiction was not apparent
from the notice of appeal and warned that the appeal would be dismissed for lack of
jurisdiction unless the Court received a response showing grounds for continuing the
appeal. In a response, the State explained that there is no justiciable controversy to
1 resolve in this appeal because the trial court granted the State’s motion to dismiss
Trial Cause Number F22-39753 after Babino was convicted in another case.1
Generally, an appeal may be taken by a defendant in a criminal case only after
a final conviction. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a) (establishing time for appeal by a
defendant after a sentence is imposed in open court or the trial court signs an
appealable order). In criminal cases, the courts of appeals have jurisdiction only of
appeals authorized by a statute. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 44.02; Abbott
v. State, 271 S.W.3d 694, 697 n.8 (Tex. Crim. App. 2008) (A defendant’s general
right to appeal under Article 44.02 has always been limited to appeal from a final
judgment.). Neither of the parties have shown that the trial court has imposed
sentence in open court or signed an order that may be appealed at this time. See Tex.
R. App. P. 26.2(a). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. See
id. 43.2(f).
APPEAL DISMISSED.
PER CURIAM
Submitted on May 28, 2024 Opinion Delivered May 29, 2024 Do Not Publish
Before Horton, Johnson and Wright, JJ.
On April 25, 2024, Babino filed a notice of appeal from his conviction in 1
Trial Cause Number 23DCCR1062. Upon receiving the notice of appeal, we docketed Appeal Number 09-24-00154-CR. That appeal is unaffected by the dismissal of Appeal Number 09-24-00153-CR. 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Ronald Babino v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ronald-babino-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2024.