Ronald Alexander LeBlanc, Sr. v. Sandra Ransom

Court of Appeals of Texas

Ronald Alexander LeBlanc, Sr. v. Sandra Ransom

DecidedAugust 19, 2004

Docket13-04-00363-CV

StatusPublished

This text of Ronald Alexander LeBlanc, Sr. v. Sandra Ransom (Ronald Alexander LeBlanc, Sr. v. Sandra Ransom) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ronald Alexander LeBlanc, Sr. v. Sandra Ransom, (Tex. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

NUMBER 13-04-363-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________________

RONALD ALEXANDER LEBLANC, SR., Appellant,

v.

SANDRA RANSOM, Appellee.

____________________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 267th District Court

of Victoria County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Hinojosa, Yañez, and Garza

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, RONALD ALEXANDER LEBLANC, SR., attempted to perfect an appeal from an order entered by the 267th District Court of Victoria County, Texas, in cause no. 03-8-60,149-C. The clerk’s record was received on July 13, 2004.

Upon review of the clerk’s record, it appeared that the order from which this appeal was taken was not a final appealable order. Pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 42.3, notice of this defect was given so that steps could be taken to correct the defect, if it could be done. Appellant was advised that, if the defect was not corrected within ten days from the date of receipt of this notice, the appeal would be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Appellee has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal, and appellant has filed a response to appellee’s motion.

The Court, having considered the documents on file, appellee’s motion to dismiss the appeal, and appellant’s response thereto, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Appellee’s motion to dismiss the appeal is GRANTED. The appeal is hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION.

PER CURIAM

Memorandum opinion delivered and filed this

the 19th day of August, 2004.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

NUMBER 13-04-363-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________________

RONALD ALEXANDER LEBLANC, SR., Appellant,

v.

SANDRA RANSOM, Appellee.

____________________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 267th District Court

of Victoria County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Hinojosa, Yañez, and Garza

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, RONALD ALEXANDER LEBLANC, SR., attempted to perfect an appeal from an order entered by the 267th District Court of Victoria County, Texas, in cause no. 03-8-60,149-C. The clerk’s record was received on July 13, 2004.

Upon review of the clerk’s record, it appeared that the order from which this appeal was taken was not a final appealable order. Pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 42.3, notice of this defect was given so that steps could be taken to correct the defect, if it could be done. Appellant was advised that, if the defect was not corrected within ten days from the date of receipt of this notice, the appeal would be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Appellee has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal, and appellant has filed a response to appellee’s motion.

The Court, having considered the documents on file, appellee’s motion to dismiss the appeal, and appellant’s response thereto, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Appellee’s motion to dismiss the appeal is GRANTED. The appeal is hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION.

PER CURIAM

Memorandum opinion delivered and filed this

the 19th day of August, 2004.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Ronald Alexander LeBlanc, Sr. v. Sandra Ransom, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ronald-alexander-leblanc-sr-v-sandra-ransom-texapp-2004.