Ronald A. Wilson v. Sewall Smith, (Warden)
This text of 983 F.2d 1059 (Ronald A. Wilson v. Sewall Smith, (Warden)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Ronald A. WILSON, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Sewall SMITH, (Warden), Defendant-Appellee.
No. 92-6915.
United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: October 20, 1992
Decided: December 31, 1992
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Walter E. Black, Jr., Chief District Judge. (CA-92-2233-B)
Ronald A. Wilson, Appellant Pro Se.
D.Md.
Affirmed.
Before MURNAGHAN and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and SPROUSE, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
OPINION
Ronald A. Wilson appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Wilson v. Smith, No. CA-92-2233-B (D. Md. Aug. 24, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
983 F.2d 1059, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 37254, 1992 WL 387524, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ronald-a-wilson-v-sewall-smith-warden-ca4-1992.