Ronald A. Wilson v. Sewall Smith, (Warden)

983 F.2d 1059, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 37254, 1992 WL 387524
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedDecember 31, 1992
Docket92-6915
StatusUnpublished

This text of 983 F.2d 1059 (Ronald A. Wilson v. Sewall Smith, (Warden)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ronald A. Wilson v. Sewall Smith, (Warden), 983 F.2d 1059, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 37254, 1992 WL 387524 (4th Cir. 1992).

Opinion

983 F.2d 1059

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Ronald A. WILSON, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Sewall SMITH, (Warden), Defendant-Appellee.

No. 92-6915.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: October 20, 1992
Decided: December 31, 1992

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Walter E. Black, Jr., Chief District Judge. (CA-92-2233-B)

Ronald A. Wilson, Appellant Pro Se.

D.Md.

Affirmed.

Before MURNAGHAN and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and SPROUSE, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

OPINION

Ronald A. Wilson appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Wilson v. Smith, No. CA-92-2233-B (D. Md. Aug. 24, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Waid (James Carl, Jr.) v. Blankenship (w.d.)
983 F.2d 1059 (Fourth Circuit, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
983 F.2d 1059, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 37254, 1992 WL 387524, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ronald-a-wilson-v-sewall-smith-warden-ca4-1992.