Ronald A. Katz Technology Licensing LP v. American Airlines, Inc.

Federal Circuit

Ronald A. Katz Technology Licensing LP v. American Airlines, Inc.

390 F. App'x 993

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided August 12, 2010·No. Nos. 2009-1450, 2009-1451, 2009-1452, 2009-1468, 2009-1469, 2010-1017·Published

Opinion

ON MOTION

ORDER

The appellees move without opposition for leave to file a joint response to Ronald A. Katz Technology Licensing LP’s (Katz) motion to strike that is contained in Katz’s reply brief. Katz does not oppose and separately moves without opposition for leave to file a reply if the appellees’ motion is granted. Katz also moves for judicial notice of a district court order in a related case. The document is attached to the motion for judicial notice.

Upon consideration thereof,

It Is Ordered That:

(1) The appellees’ motion is granted.

(2) Katz’s motion for leave to reply is granted to the extent that Katz may file a response, not to exceed four pages, within seven calendar days of the date of filing of this order.

(3) Katz’s motion for judicial notice is granted.

[995] (4) A copy of this order, the appellees’ response, and Katz’s response shall be transmitted to the merits panel assigned to hear these eases.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ON MOTION

ORDER

The appellees move without opposition for leave to file a joint response to Ronald A. Katz Technology Licensing LP’s (Katz) motion to strike that is contained in Katz’s reply brief. Katz does not oppose and separately moves without opposition for leave to file a reply if the appellees’ motion is granted. Katz also moves for judicial notice of a district court order in a related case. The document is attached to the motion for judicial notice.

Upon consideration thereof,

It Is Ordered That:

(1) The appellees’ motion is granted.

(2) Katz’s motion for leave to reply is granted to the extent that Katz may file a response, not to exceed four pages, within seven calendar days of the date of filing of this order.

(3) Katz’s motion for judicial notice is granted.

[995] (4) A copy of this order, the appellees’ response, and Katz’s response shall be transmitted to the merits panel assigned to hear these eases.

Ronald A. Katz Technology Licensing LP v. American Airlines, Inc., 390 F. App'x 993 (Fed. Cir. 2010).

Pincite

390 F. App'x 993 (Ronald A. Katz Technology Licensing LP v. American Airlines, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.