Ron St. John, Senovio Ramirez and Bravo Steel Products, Inc. v. Abraham Baksht
Opinion
NUMBER 13-09-00454-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ____________________________________________________________
RON ST. JOHN, SENOVIO RAMIREZ AND BRAVO STEEL PRODUCTS, INC., Appellants,
v.
ABRAHAM BAKSHT, Appellee. ____________________________________________________________
On appeal from the 370th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas. ____________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Yañez, Garza, and Benavides Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam
Appellants, Ron St. John, Senovio Ramirez, and Bravo Steel Products, Inc.,
perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the 370th District Court of Hidalgo
County, Texas, in cause number C-4725-99-G. Appellants have filed a motion for voluntary dismissal of their appeal on grounds that appellants no longer desire to pursue
their appeal. Appellants request that this Court dismiss the appeal.
The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellants= motion for
voluntary dismissal of their appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted.
See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a). Appellants= motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is
hereby DISMISSED. Costs will be taxed against appellants. See TEX. R. APP. P.
42.1(d) ("Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant.").
Having dismissed the appeal at appellants= request, no motion for rehearing will be
entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith. Any pending motions are dismissed
as moot.
PER CURIAM
Delivered and filed the 7th day of October, 2010.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ron St. John, Senovio Ramirez and Bravo Steel Products, Inc. v. Abraham Baksht (Ron St. John, Senovio Ramirez and Bravo Steel Products, Inc. v. Abraham Baksht) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.