Ron O. Young v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMay 17, 2017
DocketA17A1629
StatusPublished

This text of Ron O. Young v. State (Ron O. Young v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ron O. Young v. State, (Ga. Ct. App. 2017).

Opinion

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ May 16, 2017

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A17A1629. RON O. YOUNG v. THE STATE.

During the summer and early fall of 2004, Ron O. Young raped and/or sexually assaulted five women. In October 2006, he was tried and convicted for multiple offenses, including four counts of rape, and the trial court sentenced him to life without parole. Young appealed, and his convictions were affirmed in an unpublished opinion. See Case Number A08A0591 (decided April 2, 2008). In 2016, Young purported to file a “Motion to Correct Void Sentence,” arguing that his sentence of life without parole is impermissible. The State moved to dismiss the motion, arguing that it was filed by a fellow prisoner. The trial court granted the motion to dismiss, and Young filed this appeal. Pretermitting whether dismissal was proper, Young is not entitled to a direct appeal. A direct appeal may be taken from an order denying or dismissing a motion to vacate a void sentence only if the defendant raises a colorable claim that the sentence is, in fact, void. See Harper v. State, 286 Ga. 216, 217 n.1 (686 SE2d 786) (2009); Burg v. State, 297 Ga. App. 118, 119 (676 SE2d 465) (2009). A sentence is void only if it imposes punishment that the law does not allow. Crumbley v. State, 261 Ga. 610, 611 (1) (409 SE2d 517) (1991). “Motions to vacate a void sentence generally are limited to claims that – even assuming the existence and validity of the conviction for which the sentence was imposed – the law does not authorize that sentence, most typically because it exceeds the most severe punishment for which the applicable penal statute provides.” Von Thomas v. State, 293 Ga. 569, 572 (2) (748 SE2d 446) (2013). Contrary to Young’s contention, life without parole is a lawful sentence for rape. See OCGA § 16-6-1 (b) (“A person convicted of the offense of rape shall be punished by death, by imprisonment for life without parole, by imprisonment for life, or by a split sentence that is a term of imprisonment for not less than 25 years and not exceeding life imprisonment, followed by probation for life.”). Accordingly, Young has failed to raise a colorable void sentence claim, and this appeal is hereby DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 05/16/2017 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Harper v. State
686 S.E.2d 786 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2009)
Burg v. State
676 S.E.2d 465 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2009)
Crumbley v. State
409 S.E.2d 517 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1991)
von Thomas v. State
748 S.E.2d 446 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Ron O. Young v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ron-o-young-v-state-gactapp-2017.