Ron-Lee, Inc. v. Lariosa

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Ron-Lee, Inc. v. Lariosa

362 So. 2d 470, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 17232

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedSeptember 19, 1978

DocketNos. 77-1731, 77-1978

StatusPublished

This text of 362 So. 2d 470 (Ron-Lee, Inc. v. Lariosa) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ron-Lee, Inc. v. Lariosa, 362 So. 2d 470, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 17232 (Fla. Ct. App. 1978).

Pincite

Opinion

KEHOE, Judge.

Appellant, defendant and third party plaintiff below, brings these consolidated appeals from orders dismissing its fourth amended complaint with prejudice against appellees, third party defendants below. We affirm.

We have carefully reviewed the appellant’s fourth amended complaint and have formed the opinion that the complaint does not set forth sufficient allegations to state a cause of action for indemnity or contribution against appellees. Because this opinion is consistent with the orders appealed entered by the trial court, the orders are affirmed. See Stuart v. Hertz, 351 So.2d 703 (Fla.1977); VTN Inc. v. Coastal Engineering Associates, 341 So.2d 226 (Fla. 2d DCA 1976); Armor Elevator Co., Inc., v. Elevator Sales & Service, Inc., 309 So.2d 44 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975); and Hutchings v. Harry, 242 So.2d 153 (Fla. 3d DCA 1970).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

KEHOE, Judge.

Appellant, defendant and third party plaintiff below, brings these consolidated appeals from orders dismissing its fourth amended complaint with prejudice against appellees, third party defendants below. We affirm.

We have carefully reviewed the appellant’s fourth amended complaint and have formed the opinion that the complaint does not set forth sufficient allegations to state a cause of action for indemnity or contribution against appellees. Because this opinion is consistent with the orders appealed entered by the trial court, the orders are affirmed. See Stuart v. Hertz, 351 So.2d 703 (Fla.1977); VTN Inc. v. Coastal Engineering Associates, 341 So.2d 226 (Fla. 2d DCA 1976); Armor Elevator Co., Inc., v. Elevator Sales & Service, Inc., 309 So.2d 44 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975); and Hutchings v. Harry, 242 So.2d 153 (Fla. 3d DCA 1970).

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

362 So. 2d 470, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 17232, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ron-lee-inc-v-lariosa-fladistctapp-1978.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack